Comparative approaches to estimating lifetime post-stroke costs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21115/JBES.v17.p2-10Keywords:
stroke, productivity loss, direct costs, indirect costs, timedriven activity-based costingAbstract
Introduction: Stroke has a significant impact on health and has risen by 62% among individuals under the age of 45, which mainly represents greater productivity losses. Objectives: To estimate the lifetime direct and indirect financial burden of stroke in Brazil, comparing the estimates obtained through Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) with the reimbursement data for public (DataSUS) and private (TISS) patients. Methods: We developed a Markov model to simulate the lifetime costs associated with stroke. Transition probabilities, the frequency of resource use, and productivity loss were derived from the population-based Joinville Stroke Registry (Joinvasc). The direct costs included medication and healthcare services, while indirect costs covered formal and informal caregiving, nursing home stays, and productivity loss. We assessed healthcare services costs using the TDABC method and compared these with reimbursement values from DataSUS and TISS. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (53991221.1.0000.5362). Results: Applying TDABC, we estimated the total discounted post-stroke costs to be BRL 96,562. In comparison, total discounted costs estimated using reimbursement values from DataSUS and TISS were BRL 71,498 and BRL 125,569, respectively, showing significant variations (BRL 30,404 with TDABC, BRL 4,378 with DataSUS, and BRL 48,748 with TISS). Indirect costs amounted to BRL 63,588, with productivity loss being the most significant contributor (BRL 59,990). Conclusions: Prioritizing TDABC for costing and analyzing indirect costs is crucial for understanding the stroke’s financial burden in Brazil. The prevalent reliance on healthcare reimbursement data for decision-making might overlook substantial stroke-related costs, potentially limiting access to necessary treatments.
Downloads
References
Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS). Dados Disponíveis D-TISS. 2023. Available from: https://www.gov.br/ans/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/perfil-do-setor/dados-e-indicadores-do-setor
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). Continuous National Household Sample Survey. 2022. Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/trabalho/9173-pesquisa-nacional-por-amostra-de--domicilios-continua-trimestral.html?edicao=35504
Cabral NL, Cougo-Pinto PT, Magalhaes PS, Longo AL, Moro CH, Amaral CH, et al. Trends of Stroke Incidence from 1995 to 2013 in Joinville, Brazil. Neuroepidemiology. 2016;46(4):273-81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445060
Cabral NL, Gonçalves AR, Longo AL, Moro CH, Costa G, Amaral CH, et al. Trends in stroke incidence, mortality and case fatality rates in Joinville, Brazil: 1995-2006. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80(7):749-54. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2008.164475
DataSUS. TabWin: Transferência de Arquivos. 2022. Available from: https://datasus.saude.gov.br/transferencia-de-arquivos/
Diegoli H, Magalhães P, Makdisse M, Cabral Moro CH, França P, Longo A. Joinvasc: Organizing the Full Cycle of Stroke Care with Universal Coverage. NEJM Catalyst. 2022;4(1). https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.22.0283
Diegoli H, Magalhães PSC, Makdisse MRP, Moro CHC, França PHC, Lange MC, et al. Real-World Populational-Based Quality of Life and Functional Status After Stroke. Value Health Reg Issues. 2023a;36:76-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2023.02.005
Diegoli H, Makdisse M, Magalhães P, Gray M. The atlas of variation in healthcare Brazil: remarkable findings from a middle-income country. Res Health Serv Reg. 2023b;2(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43999-022-00017-z
Etges APBS, Anschau F, Pires LBR. Revisão de remuneração do SUS para linha de cuidado do AVC isquêmico por meio de microcusteio. J Bras EconSaúde. 2022a;14(2).
Etges APBDS, Marcolino MAZ, Ogliari LA, de Souza AC, Zanotto BS, Ruschel R, et al. Moving the Brazilian ischaemic stroke pathway to a value-based care: introduction of a risk-adjusted cost estimate model for stroke treatment. Health Policy Plan. 2022b;37(9):1098-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czac058
International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook Database. 2021. Available from: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2021/October
Katan M, Luft A. Global Burden of Stroke. Semin Neurol. 2018;38(2):208-11. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649503
Ministry of Health. Management System of the Table of Procedures, Medications, Orthoses, Prostheses and Materials of the Unified Health System (SIGTAP) - Unified Table. 2023. Available from: http://sigtap.datasus.gov.br/tabela-unificada/app/sec/inicio.jsp?first=15
Ouriques Martins SC, Sacks C, Hacke W, Brainin M, de Assis Figueiredo F, Marques Pontes-Neto O, et al. Priorities to reduce the burden of stroke in Latin American countries. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(7):674-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30068-7
Owolabi MO, Thrift AG, Mahal A, Ishida M, Martins S, Johnson WD, et al. Primary stroke prevention worldwide: translating evidence into action. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(1):e74-e85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00230-9
Strilciuc S, Grad DA, Radu C, Chira D, Stan A, Ungureanu M, et al. The economic burden of stroke: a systematic review of cost of illness studies. J Med Life. 2021;14(5):606-19. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2021-0361
Sudlow CL, Warlow CP. Comparing Stroke Incidence Worldwide. Stroke. 1996;27(3):550-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.27.3.550