Cost-utility of pharmacogenetic testing as a guide for the treatment of depression from the Brazilian Supplementary Health System perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21115/JBES.v15.n3.p178-189Keywords:
depression, pharmacogenomic testing, cost-effectiveness, Markov chainsAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the cost-utility of pharmacogenetic testing incorporation as an additional tool in guiding the selection of optimal drug treatments for individuals with depression. Methods: A decision analytical model was created based on the Markov model for this analysis. The evaluation was conducted from the perspective of the Brazilian Supplementary Health System, with a time horizon of 10 years. The study included direct medical and technology costs and a comparison with traditional empirical treatment for depression was performed. Transition probabilities were derived from an analysis of available literature. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were also carried out. Additionally, an evaluation was conducted from the perspective of Society, including the costs of drug treatment carried out by patients. Results: The application of pharmacogenetic testing as a guide for depression treatment demonstrated favorable outcomes, yielding savings of -R$ 3,439.97 per patient and an increase of 0.39 QALY
over the specified time frame. Thus, significant savings were evident, corresponding to -R$ 8,776.78 per QALY saved. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the model’s robustness. In the Society’s perspective scenario, the outcome was even more favorable, resulting in savings of -R$ 9,381.49 per patient and a 0.39 increase in QALYs, equivalent to -R$ 23,936.05 per QALY saved. Conclusion: The study findings reveal that incorporating pharmacogenetic tests in depression treatment offers economic benefits, evidenced by an increase in QALY value and a decrease in direct medical costs compared to conventional empirical treatment. This aligns with
the ongoing trend towards personalized mental health care, implying practical considerations for protocol reassessment and the possible integration of pharmacogenetic tests as a standard of care.